mcmc method Search Results


90
Hasegawa Co Ltd mcmc method
Mcmc Method, supplied by Hasegawa Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc method/product/Hasegawa Co Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Verlag GmbH likelihood , bayesian , and mcmc methods in quantitative genetics
Likelihood , Bayesian , And Mcmc Methods In Quantitative Genetics, supplied by Verlag GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/likelihood , bayesian , and mcmc methods in quantitative genetics/product/Verlag GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
likelihood , bayesian , and mcmc methods in quantitative genetics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute procedure mi with the mcmc method
Procedure Mi With The Mcmc Method, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/procedure mi with the mcmc method/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
procedure mi with the mcmc method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Abacus Concepts mcmc tree method
Mcmc Tree Method, supplied by Abacus Concepts, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc tree method/product/Abacus Concepts
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc tree method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Varian Medical mcmc method
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Mcmc Method, supplied by Varian Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc method/product/Varian Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Nissen mcmc methods
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Mcmc Methods, supplied by Nissen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc methods/product/Nissen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc methods - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute software's user guide on mcmc method specification
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Software's User Guide On Mcmc Method Specification, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/software's user guide on mcmc method specification/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
software's user guide on mcmc method specification - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute mcmc methods sas software 9.2
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Mcmc Methods Sas Software 9.2, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc methods sas software 9.2/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc methods sas software 9.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Gilson Inc mcmc methods
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Mcmc Methods, supplied by Gilson Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc methods/product/Gilson Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc methods - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute mcmc method
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Mcmc Method, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc method/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Janssen mcmc method
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Mcmc Method, supplied by Janssen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc method/product/Janssen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
National Research Council Canada mcmc procedure
Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.
Mcmc Procedure, supplied by National Research Council Canada, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcmc procedure/product/National Research Council Canada
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcmc procedure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.

Journal: Earth and Space Science (Hoboken, N.j.)

Article Title: Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework

doi: 10.1029/2021EA002162

Figure Lengend Snippet: Flow chart of the method used to impute the missing solutions within and between Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions. First, the informative priors were derived from the GRACE (‐FO) for a single grid point/basin time series as the ranges of the intercepts, slopes, variability, amplitudes, and frequencies of the annual and semiannual cycles in the GRACE (‐FO) time series, assuming an additive generative model describing the geophysical signal in GRACE data as long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variability), annual, and semi‐annual. Second, we combined the likelihood data and the priors in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to generate posterior distributions for each of the component storages. Third, we merged the median of the posteriors for the component storages to reconstruct the full GRACE (‐FO) total water storage and its uncertainty at 95% credible interval. We added the residuals back to the observed time series to preserve the same variability as the original GRACE time series. We applied 5‐fold cross validations to validate the model internally and generate a predictive posterior distribution that can be used to infer the present and near future of the total signal.

Article Snippet: We then used the MCMC method to generate 2,000 samples from the posterior distribution ( P ( θ | D ) for each component (Durbin & Koopman, ; Harvey, ; Scott & Varian, ) (Figure ).

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Sampling

Modeled total water storage during the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE‐Follow On gap as the sum of the median posterior distribution of long‐term variability (variability ≥12‐month, including secular trend and interannual‐decadal variations), annual and semi‐annual signals between April 2002 and April 2021, sampled from 2,000 steps using Markov Chain Monte Carlo with the No‐U‐Turn Sampling method. Uncertainties associated with these signals are provided in supplementary materials at 5% and 95% levels (Figures S2, S3 in Supporting Information  ).

Journal: Earth and Space Science (Hoboken, N.j.)

Article Title: Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework

doi: 10.1029/2021EA002162

Figure Lengend Snippet: Modeled total water storage during the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE‐Follow On gap as the sum of the median posterior distribution of long‐term variability (variability ≥12‐month, including secular trend and interannual‐decadal variations), annual and semi‐annual signals between April 2002 and April 2021, sampled from 2,000 steps using Markov Chain Monte Carlo with the No‐U‐Turn Sampling method. Uncertainties associated with these signals are provided in supplementary materials at 5% and 95% levels (Figures S2, S3 in Supporting Information ).

Article Snippet: We then used the MCMC method to generate 2,000 samples from the posterior distribution ( P ( θ | D ) for each component (Durbin & Koopman, ; Harvey, ; Scott & Varian, ) (Figure ).

Techniques: Sampling

[a] Markov Chain Monte Carlo regression model diagnostic test with coefficient of determination (r 2 ). [b] Empirical cumulative density function (ecdf) for r 2 showing ≥80% of the grid cells have r 2 ≥ 58%. Variabilities in the predictable signal and the residuals are provided in SI (Figure S5 in Supporting Information  ).

Journal: Earth and Space Science (Hoboken, N.j.)

Article Title: Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework

doi: 10.1029/2021EA002162

Figure Lengend Snippet: [a] Markov Chain Monte Carlo regression model diagnostic test with coefficient of determination (r 2 ). [b] Empirical cumulative density function (ecdf) for r 2 showing ≥80% of the grid cells have r 2 ≥ 58%. Variabilities in the predictable signal and the residuals are provided in SI (Figure S5 in Supporting Information ).

Article Snippet: We then used the MCMC method to generate 2,000 samples from the posterior distribution ( P ( θ | D ) for each component (Durbin & Koopman, ; Harvey, ; Scott & Varian, ) (Figure ).

Techniques: Diagnostic Assay